Friday, August 21, 2020
The Relationship of Childhood Sexual Abuse to Teenage Pregnancy
Running Head: RESEARCH ARTICLE REVIEW Research Article Review The Relationship of Childhood Sexual Abuse to Teenage Pregnancy Ashlee L. Glover Lindenwood University The Relationship of Childhood Sexual Abuse to Teenage Pregnancy I. Questions and Answers 1. ââ¬Å"The reason for this investigation was to inspect the connection between youth sexual maltreatment and high school pregnancyâ⬠(Roosa, Tein, Reinholtz, and Angelini, 1997). 2. ââ¬Å"Three examine questions guided this exertion. In the first place, do ladies who were explicitly manhandled as kids and ladies who had high school pregnancy have comparable formative foundations (sociodemographic and hazard factor profiles)? Second, does the hazard for high school pregnancy contrast, in view of whether a lady was explicitly manhandled as a youngster, explicitly gifted, or both? Third, does youth sexual maltreatment add to an expanded danger of having a high school pregnancy after the impact of different variables identified with adolescent pregnancy (e. g. , social class) have been accounted forâ⬠(Roosa et al. 1997)? 3. ââ¬Å"We anticipate that casualties of sexual maltreatment should have first deliberate intercourse prior, to be less inclined to utilize contraception, to be bound to take an interest in high-hazard sexual practices (e. g. , sex with outsiders), and to have a higher number of sexual accomplices than their friends who were not explicitly abusedâ⬠(Roosa et al. , 1997). 4. The factors b eing examined is sexual history, High-hazard sexual conduct, Sexual maltreatment, Sexual history pathways, youth physical maltreatment, and High-chance practices. Roosa et al. , 1997). 5. The members were 2,003 ladies, 18 to 22 years of age, living in Arizona. (Roosa et al. , 1997). 6. ââ¬Å"Participants finished the survey alone or in gatherings. They recorded their reactions on PC scored answer sheets to ease information passage and limit mistakes. In the wake of finishing the poll, a member put her answer sheet in an envelope, fixed the envelope, and offered it to either the undertaking chief or organization representativeâ⬠(Roosa et al. , 1997). 7. We utilized chi-square and investigation of difference to think about sociodemographic and hazard factor profiles of (a) ladies who were explicitly manhandled as kids with their non-mishandled friends and (b) ladies who had high school pregnancy with the individuals who didn't. Next, we thought about the frequency of young preg nancy for five sexual history pathways utilizing chi-square. At last, we utilized calculated relapse to decide if encounters of youth sexual maltreatment added to chance for young pregnancy after the impacts of different factors had been accounted forâ⬠(Roosa et al. 1997). 8. ââ¬Å"The aftereffects of our examination don't bolster contentions that sexual maltreatment is a significant supporter of the hazard for high school pregnancyâ⬠(Roosa et al. , 1997). 9. The significance of the discoveries is that youth sexual maltreatment contributed little to the probability of high school pregnancy. The seriousness of sexual maltreatment was not fundamentally identified with young pregnancy. Sexual maltreatment followed by sexual intelligence was identified with a higher danger of young pregnancy for a few. (Roosa et al. , 1997). 10. The outcomes were restricted by two methodological variables. To start with, the example, albeit huge, was an example of comfort from a solitary st ate, and members were marginally more instructed than the normal for this associate. Second, this was a cross-sectional examination that depended on the review of occasions that happened a few fundamental years before the surveyâ⬠(Roosa et al. , 1997). 11. ââ¬Å"It might be significant for future examinations to recognize factors that clarify the hazard related with sexual maltreatment for these subgroupsâ⬠(Roosa et al. , 1997). It was additionally expressed that later on longitudinal examinations are important to set up causality. Roosa et al. , 1997). II. Rundown The United States has the most noteworthy pace of high school pregnancy with around 25 percent of all U. S. ladies having a pregnancy by the age of 18 (Roosa et al. , 1997). The reason for this investigation was to decide whether youth sexual maltreatment is a factor related with an expanded hazard for high school pregnancies (Roosa et al. , 1997). Late investigations have detailed that sexual maltreatment is more typical among pregnant youngsters than by and large populace and accordingly might be a significant supporter of high school pregnancy. Numerous instruments have been proposed to clarify the linkage between youth sexual maltreatment and adolescent pregnancy. Roosa et al. , (1997) illustrated a few instruments including (a) some young pregnancies might be the immediate aftereffect of sexual maltreatment, (b) youth sexual maltreatment may mingle female casualties to accept that their motivation in life is to satisfy the sexual needs of others, (c) the brought down confidence of sexual maltreatment casualties may make them progressively defenseless against malesââ¬â¢ lewd gestures, and (d) survivors of interbreeding may design pregnancies as a methods for getting away from their exploitation. Three research addresses guided this exertion: First, do ladies who were explicitly manhandled as youngsters and ladies who had high school pregnancy have comparative formative foundations (sociodemographic and chance factor profiles)? Second, does the hazard for young pregnancy vary, in light of whether a lady was explicitly mishandled as a kid, explicitly gifted, or both? Furthermore, for the individuals who experienced both maltreatment and intelligence, does the overall planning of these occasions have any kind of effect in hazard for high school pregnancy? Third, does youth sexual maltreatment add to an expanded danger of having an adolescent pregnancy after the impact of different variables identified with young pregnancy (e. g. , social class) have been represented? (Roosa et al. , 1997) The factors being considered are sexual history, high-hazard sexual conduct, sexual maltreatment, sexual history pathways, youth physical maltreatment, and high-chance practices. Sexual history was evaluated by getting some information about the respondentââ¬â¢s period of menarche, first coital experience, utilization of anti-conception medication, and pregnancy (Roosa et al. 1997). Any pregnancy happening before age 18 was marked a high school pregnancy. High hazard sexual conduct was depicted as any individual who had intercourse for liquor, medications, or cash; engaging in sexual relations with outsiders, having numerous sex accomplices, and not utilizing conception prevention (Roosa et al. , 1997). Roosa et al. , (1997) utilized five commonly sexual history pathways to look at the connection between youth sexual maltreatment and high school pregnancy: One pathway spoke to the individuals who announced no gifted sexual action and no sexual maltreatment before the age of 18. A subsequent pathway spoke to ladies who were explicitly manhandled before age 18 with no intelligent sexual movement. A third pathway spoke to the individuals who had been manhandled before their first gifted sexual experience. A fourth pathway spoke to the individuals who had been mishandled before age 18 however after their first bright sexual experience. A fifth pathway spoke to members who had not encountered any sexual maltreatment before the age of 18 however who were explicitly intelligent. The last estimates utilized were youth physical maltreatment. Eight inquiries managing punishing and hitting adjusted from the Conflict Tactics Scale (Roosa et al. , 1997). Members were 2,003 ladies, 18 to 22 years of age, living in Arizona (Roosa et al. , 1997). Investment was restricted to this age range to lessen revealing inclination because of broadly shifting time interims since sexual history occasions happened (Roosa et al. , 1997). The ladies were enrolled at 44 locales in urban and rustic regions all through Arizona (Roosa estimated time of arrival l. , 1997). Members finished the survey alone or in gatherings, with help from the undertaking supervisor (Roosa et al. 1997). They recorded their reactions on PC scored answer sheets to ease information section and limit blunder (Roosa et al. , 1997). To examine the outcomes chi-square and investigation of difference were utilized to think about sociodemographic and hazard factor profiles of (a) ladies who were explicitly mishandled as youngsters with their non-manhandled friends and (b) l adies who had a high school pregnancy with the individuals who didn't (Roosa et al. , 1997). Next, they analyzed the rate of high school pregnancy for five sexual history pathways utilizing chi-square (Roosa et al. , 1997). At last, they utilized strategic relapse to decide if encounters of youth sexual maltreatment added to the hazard for young pregnancy after the impacts of different factors had been represented (Roosa et al. , 1997). Utilizing information from 2,003 ladies this investigation adopted three strategies to look at the connection between youth sexual maltreatment and the probability of high school pregnancy. The aftereffects of the examination didn't bolster the contention that sexual maltreatment is a significant supporter of the hazard for high school pregnancy (Roosa et al. , 1997). Youth sexual maltreatment contributed little to the probability of adolescent pregnancy in this example (Roosa et al. , 1997). As per Roosa et al. , (1997), it might be significant for future examinations to recognize factors that clarify the hazard related with sexual maltreatment of various subgroups. Despite the qualities of affiliations found or the quantity of elements statically controlled, it can't be resolved which connections might be easygoing and which might be fake (Roosa et al. , 1997). Longitudinal investigations are important to build up causality.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.